Treatment of Drinking Water
English: % of households effectively treating their drinking water
French: % de ménages traitant efficacement leur eau potable
Czech: % domácností efektivně ošetřujících svoji pitnou vodu
What is its purpose?
Unsafe water is among the main sources of life-threatening, waterborne diseases. This indicator therefore assesses the prevalence of households using effective methods for treating drinking water.
How to Collect and Analyse the Required Data
Collect the following data by conducting individual interviews with a representative sample of the target group members:
RECOMMENDED SURVEY QUESTIONS (Q) AND POSSIBLE ANSWERS (A)
Q1: Do you or other family member somehow treat the water which you and your family drink?
A1: yes / no
Q2: How do you treat the water?
1) let it stand and settle
2) pour it through a cloth
3) boil it
4) use ceramic/ sand/ other water filter
5) add bleach/ chlorine
6) use disinfectant powder
7) use solar disinfection
8) other: ...................................
NOTES: 1) more answers possible; 2) adjust the pre-set answers according to the local context; 3) do not read the answers; 4) only answers 3-7 (or possibly other pre-approved methods) can be counted as "effective water treatment methods" - others do not count.
Calculate the indicator's value by dividing the number of households effectively treating their drinking water (i.e. using options 3-7) by the total number of respondents and multiplying the result by 100.
1) If you want to increase the validity of the provided responses, consider adding another point: asking the respondent to show the data collector the water treatment method s/he uses (for example, a functioning water filter or bottle of chlorine), possibly also to demonstrate how s/he uses it. Only those who manage to do so can be considered as "using effective water treatment methods".
2) "Let it stand and settle" and "pour it through a cloth" are very common practices which help to reduce the number of physical particles in the drinking water. However, they do not make the water safer to drink and therefore in your data analysis cannot be considered as "effective water treatment methods".
3) In some countries, data collectors do not correctly distinguish answers "pour it through a cloth" and "use ..... water filter" - make sure these options are clearly defined and data collectors understand the difference.
4) In some contexts, asking people to treat drinking water might not be necessary (e.g. if water from safe sources is used). In such case, focus the indicator (and related project activity) only on households which do not use drinking water from safe sources. In other contexts, ensuring that people treat drinking water might be hard to achieve (due to ingrained habits; scarcity of firewood or disinfectants). In such case, focus the indicator (and related project activity) on water drunk by children aged 6-59 months only (as they are most at risk of life-threatening waterborne diseases).
5) WHO's "Toolkit for Monitoring and Evaluating Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage Programmes" proposes a range of related indicators you might want to take advantage of, such as:
> knowledge of correct water treatment
> demonstration of correct water treatment
> household's access to water treatment products
6) Disaggregate the data by wealth.