1) Take maximum advantage of all the guidance provided by FANTA’s Household Hunger Scale Guide.
2) The HHS indicator is most appropriate for areas affected by very high levels of food insecurity. The HFIAS indicator, in contrast, can be used both in areas of low and high food insecurity.
3) Since HHS focuses on the food quantity dimension of food access and does not measure dietary quality, also consider including the measurement of individual dietary diversity in your survey (such as IDDS, MDD or MDD-W).
4) The data required for this indicator is prone to seasonal variations. Therefore, if you use HHS for measuring your intervention’s impact, the data has to be collected at the same time of the year.
5) Do not pick and choose HHS questions for inclusion or exclusion from the questionnaire, because it is the set of HHS questions together - not the use of each HHS question independently - that has been validated as a meaningful measure of household food deprivation.
6) Because the HHS questions cover more sensitive topics, it is recommended that they are asked towards the end of the survey.
7) According to the HHS Guide, the HHS indicator has been specifically developed and validated for cross-cultural use. Its results are therefore comparable across different cultures and settings.
8) BHA phrases the indicator differently, as "percent of households with moderate and severe Household Hunger Scale (HHS) scores".