1) This is INEE Indicator 4.8.
2) The main guidance on this indicator is designed to measure the proportion of targeted teachers who have who have signed a contract specifying their compensation and conditions of work. If the purpose of the indicator is to assess wider trends in compensation and conditions of work, beyond the project scope, it is also possible to use this indicator to measure the proportion of all teachers in the area – targeted by the action or not – who have signed a contract specifying their compensation and conditions of work. To do this, use the total number of teachers in the assessed school/learning space/community/target area as your denominator (rather than the number of targeted teachers). This data can be requested from school or learning space management or the relevant education authorities. Data gathered from measuring the indicator in this way can be used for advocating for fairer conditions for teachers more broadly.
3) If collecting information on national or broader level compensation and conditions of work beyond the scope of an individual project or programme, make sure to carefully consider the associated risks in terms of fuelling discontent, increasing tensions and causing harm. The role of the organisation/institution collecting such information also needs to be carefully considered, including the purpose of gathering such data and the mandate to do so.
4) [Optional] To determine the validity, equitability or fairness of the compensation amount or conditions of work, take the following extra steps:
- Decide what type of compensation is considered valid for the indicator ‘compensation’. For example, is there a certain amount teachers or education personnel need to receive in order to be considered ‘compensated’ for their work (refer to national or Education Cluster/Working Group standards, where available). This might be a one-off payment or ongoing amount provided on a regular basis.
- Decide when the indicator ‘conditions of work’ is considered valid. It is important to decide which information (context specific or not) falls under the category ‘conditions of work’ and how much information is needed for the indicator to be valid. For example, is it enough to only have the number of working hours per week mentioned in a contract or should there be mention of the number of leave days, overtime policy, medical insurance, etc. be mentioned as well. Where possible, refer to the national labour laws and standards that apply to schools/education. Where not possible, refer to national or Education Cluster/Working Group standards or the standards within the organization.
- To analyse the data further, check the teachers/education personnel who have not signed a contract specifying compensation and work conditions and check what they have in common. This could provide information on the reasons or criteria for receiving/not receiving or signing/not signing contracts.
- [Optional] To identify the percentage of teachers supported through coordinated conditions of work across education actors/partners (INEE indicator 4.9), utilise the conditions of work standardised by the local Education Cluster/Working Group or Ministry of Education to determine whether or not a contract meets the standards. This can include standardised job descriptions, descriptions of working conditions, and codes of conducts should be included in contracts:
- Job tasks and responsibilities;
- Compensation;
- Attendance requirements;
- Hours and days of work;
- Length of contract;
- Code of conduct;
- Support, supervision and dispute resolution mechanisms.
Once it has been established which teachers or educational personnel have such conditions in their contract, follow the same calculation as described above.
5) Related indicators:
INEE
- 4.9 % of teachers supported through coordinated conditions of work across education actors/partners
IndiKit
- % of workers with formal contracts (see Security of Employment indicator)