1) The provided set of four questions is based on WHO’s recommendation.
2) Since the prevalence of night blindness is relatively low, the margin of error must be very low (preferably 0.5); otherwise, it is unlikely that you will be able to objectively assess the impact of your intervention. This requires using a very large sample of children (ranging from 8,000 to 30,000 children) and makes assessing vitamin A deficiency quite demanding.
3) According to WHO, the prevalence of night blindness among children aged 24-71 months should be interpreted as:
0.01 – 0.99%: mild
1 – 4.99%: moderate
above 5%: severe
4) Consult and ideally co-implement the survey with the relevant health authorities, so that you increase the chances of the results being officially recognized (and ideally also acted upon).
5) Since interviewing such a large number of respondents is fairly demanding, before you conduct a new survey, first review the availability of existing data – you might be able to use it for your baseline (however, ensure that you will be able to gain comparable endline data).
6) Do not survey children younger than 24 months – they are not usually very mobile at dusk or after dark and night blindness can therefore go unnoticed.
7) Whenever possible, find and use a local name for night blindness (for example, in Ethiopia, it is known as dafint in Amhara, hema in Oromiya, and gahami in Tigray).
8) This indicator relies on accurate age assessment. Since people often do not remember the exact dates of their children’s birth, the data collectors should always verify the child’s age. This can be done by reviewing the child’s birth certificate, vaccination card or another document; however, since many caregivers do not have such documents (and since they can include mistakes), it is essential that your data collectors are able to verify the child’s age by using local events calendars. Read FAO’s Guidelines (see below) to learn how to prepare local events calendars and how to train data collectors in their correct use.