1) The cash-based assistance should follow the national Cluster / Cash Working Group’s recommendations for the percentage of the Minimum Expenditure Basket’s value. In the event that no such recommendation is available, or is not up-to-date, determine the percentage by:
a) conducting a survey among a representative sample of the target households assessing the average monthly income of each household (or if this is problematic, then the monetary value of their monthly consumption); if possible, divide the household income by the number of household members to have an accurate per-person figure; and
b) comparing this income data with the average cost of the items included in the MEB (or the Survival MEB – SMEB) on the local market
The difference between the cost of these basic items and average household income (called the income gap) will tell you what percentage of the SMEB/MEB value the assistance needs to cover (however, in some instances, the value is lowered to increase SMEB/MEB’s coverage or to mitigate the risk of dependence). At the same, take seasonality into consideration as many vulnerable households are employed and receive income temporarily.
2) The indicator can be rephrased to reflect sectoral restrictions on the use of the funds, most applicable for sector-specific voucher programming. For example: “number of households that received [specify the %] of the food basket value for [specify the period]”.
3) Alternatively, if the assistance does not relate to any basket value, it can be defined more generally, such as “number of households that received [specify the intended value] for [specify the period]”.
4) In order to identify i) whether the MEB value is still relevant; and ii) whether the provision of cash and voucher assistance does not lead to inflated market prices (due to high demand but limited supply), it is essential that you:
- monitor the average prices of pre-selected MEB items on the local market;
- assess the reasons for significant changes; and
- use the findings to adjust your programming.
5) The number of individuals can be used in place of the number of households, depending on internal or donor reporting requirements or whether the amount provided is dependent on household size. In such a case, the indicator may need to be slightly rephrased, such as “the number of individuals benefiting from distribution of cash / voucher assistance” as it will likely be only one household member physically receiving the cash.
6) The phrasing of the indicator may be changed in order to reflect the minimum income/expenditure standard commonly used in your context, e.g. Poverty Line, Survival Minimum Expenditure Basket (SMEB), Survival Threshold, Livelihood Protection Threshold, etc.